Daoud v. Daoud
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The allegations in a family offense proceeding seeking the issuance of an order of protection must be “supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence” (Family Ct Act § 832; see Matter of Aruti v Aruti, 88 AD3d 700, 701 [2011]; Matter of Ungar v Ungar, 80 AD3d 771 [2011]; Matter of Pearlman v Pearlman, 78 AD3d 711, 712 [2010]; Matter of Thomas v Thomas, 72 AD3d 834, 835 [2010]). “Only competent, material and relevant evidence may be admitted in a fact-finding hearing” (Family Ct Act § 834; see Matter of Belinda YY. v Lee ZZ., 74 AD3d 1394, 1395 [2010]).
Here, the evidence submitted in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pearlman v. PearlmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Thomas v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Aruti v. ArutiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Belinda YY. v. Lee ZZ.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ungar v. UngarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tulshi v. TulshiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Jarrett v. JarrettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Khan-Soleil v. RashadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Zina L. v. Eldred L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Nunziata v. NunziataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.