Legal Opinion
Duerr v. Cuenin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Amended order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Family Court properly denied the application of respondent for a downward modification of his child support obligation from $323.16 per week to $240 per week and a reduction *904in his responsibility for the children’s uninsured medical expenses from 75% to 67%.
It is well established that a party seeking a downward modification of a prior order concerning child support obligations must establish á change in circumstances sufficient to warrant the modification (see, Shedd v Shedd, 277 AD2d 917; Matter of Orange County Dept. of Social…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kay v. KayNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Klapper v. KlapperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Moore v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Fries v. Price-YablinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Orange County Department of Social Services v. MeehanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leroy v. LeroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Kasprowicz v. OsgoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dukes v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Kasprowicz v. OsgoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012