Legal Opinion
Anderson Machinery Co. v. Harber
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided August 1, 1979No. 12850PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’QUINN, Justice.
The controlling issue in this appeal involves the doctrine of failure of consideration under a conditional sales contract and security agreement pertaining to sale of a heavy duty machine to be used by the purchaser in construction of rural roads and earthen tanks.
Appellee Robert Lee Harber entered into agreement to purchase from Anderson Machinery Company in April of 1974 the machine described as Hancock Model 192 Elevating Motor Scraper.' Shortly thereafter Anderson Machinery assigned the contract and security agreement to Allis-Chalmers Credit Corporation. Harber made down…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reed v. BuckTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Super-Cold Southwest Co. v. ElkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Brantley v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Gutta Percha & Rubber Manufacturing Co. v. City of CleburneTexas Supreme Court · 1908
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ErvinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Capitol Aggregates, Inc. v. R.E.G. Enterprises, Inc. and Robert E. Gilfillan, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1991
- WCW International, Inc., and Chris Wilmot v. Jerry W. Broussard, Ronnie D. LaBorde, David M. Kernion, David O. Strickland, Craig M. Borel, Kevin J. Roussel, George A. Lowery and Carlos O. Giron, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- WCW International, Inc., and Chris Wilmot v. Jerry W. Broussard, Ronnie D. LaBorde, David M. Kernion, David O. Strickland, Craig M. Borel, Kevin J. Roussel, George A. Lowery and Carlos O. Giron, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014