Legal Opinion

Slade v. . Smith

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1796Published

1Opinion

As to this point, the general rule is that the Court must declare the statute law as it is to be seen in acts and statutes yet extant. That law, however, is sometimes from necessity otherwise collected. It hath been said by very learned men that many parts of the common law were acts of Parliament worn out by time. 2 Wils., 248. The common law is preserved and evidenced by judicial proceedings. In the present case there are judicial proceedings which speak of an act of the Legislature that is not now extant, upon which the deed to Vassimore purports to be founded. The deeds of 1744 and 1764…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parker v. . BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Weathersbee v. GoodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Doe on the Demise of Bruce v. FaucettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
  4. Lanier v. . AuldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1806
  5. Clark v. Arnold.Superior Court of North Carolina · 1803

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API