Mars Associates, Inc. v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment appealed from and-the order of the Appellate Division brought up for review should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in that court’s memorandum.
In addition, we note that the circumstances of the waiver demonstrate as a matter of law that it was designed to cover the claim upon which plaintiff now sues. Plaintiff is a sophisticated contractor, and in withstanding the motion for summary judgment it did not show that the instant claim for delay damages was covered by the exceptions from the blanket waiver. Those exceptions covered…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Albert Saggese, Inc. v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Clifton Steel Corp. v. County of Monroe Public Works DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Herman H. Schwartz, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.