In Re Estate of Little
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
113 P.3d 505 (2005)
In re the ESTATE OF Martin LITTLE, Deceased,
John Vannoy, Petitioner.
No. 54647-3-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
June 6, 2005.
Howard Mark Goodfriend, Edwards Sieh Smith & Goodfriend PS, Bruce Reed Moen, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Franklin William Shoichet, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
BECKER, J.
¶ 1 An executor must give notice of probate to the deceased's heirs, as required by statute. When heirs show notice was not provided to them, a completed estate will be reopened unless the executor demonstrates that the names and addresses…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Jones v. BabcockWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Hesthagen v. HarbyWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- In re the Estate of TothWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Pitzer v. Union Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re The Estate Of Constance E. Little Roxanne Trees, Res. v. Renae Roberson, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Golden v. World Gospel MissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In Re Estate of HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- In Re Estate of PalmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In re the Estate of HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007