Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Little

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 6, 2005No. 54647-3-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

113 P.3d 505 (2005)

In re the ESTATE OF Martin LITTLE, Deceased,

John Vannoy, Petitioner.

No. 54647-3-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

June 6, 2005.

Howard Mark Goodfriend, Edwards Sieh Smith & Goodfriend PS, Bruce Reed Moen, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.

Franklin William Shoichet, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

BECKER, J.

¶ 1 An executor must give notice of probate to the deceased's heirs, as required by statute. When heirs show notice was not provided to them, a completed estate will be reopened unless the executor demonstrates that the names and addresses…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Jones v. BabcockWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hesthagen v. HarbyWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In re the Estate of TothWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pitzer v. Union Bank of CaliforniaWashington Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re The Estate Of Constance E. Little Roxanne Trees, Res. v. Renae Roberson, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  2. Golden v. World Gospel MissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. In Re Estate of HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. In Re Estate of PalmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  5. In re the Estate of HitchcockCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API