Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Williams v. Turner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2012No. 2012-0085Published

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Corey J. Williams, for a writ of habeas corpus. “[H]abeas corpus is not available to remedy a claim concerning the validity of an amendment to an indictment.” Haynes v. Voorhies, 110 Ohio St.3d 243, 2006-Ohio-4355, 852 N.E.2d 1198, ¶ 5. Williams’s “claim of sentencing error is not cognizable in habeas corpus, and he had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law to raise the issue.” See Roberts v. Knab, 131 Ohio St.3d 60, 2012-Ohio-56, 960 N.E.2d 457, ¶ 1.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Connor, C.J., and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haynes v. VoorhiesOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Roberts v. KnabOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API