Legal Opinion

In re Gianasmidis

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 3, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-11440-WGYPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE

I. INTRODUCTION

This appeal from the Bankruptcy Court deals with whether the Appellants Stephen J. Kuzma ("Kuzma"), The Law Offices of Russo & Minchoff ("Russo & Minchoff"), and India L. Minchoff ("Minchoff" and collectively, the "Lawyer Creditors"), are able *445to obtain interest on the legal fees they were awarded in binding arbitration, and, if so, what the appropriate interest rate ought be from the Debtor and Appellee, Savvas V. Gianasmidis ("Gianasmidis"). Although interest generally stops accruing when a debtor files for bankruptcy, 11 U.S.C. § 506(b) provides for an…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Rake v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re GianasmidisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
  2. In re: Fog Cap Retail Investors LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2022
  3. In re: Kyra NelsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API