United States v. Alejandro-Montañez
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KAYATTA, Circuit Judge.
Criminal defendants Josué Alejandro-Montañez, Julio Severino-Batista, and Eddie Alejandro-Montañez (“Defendants”) appeal from convictions and sentences related to a criminal conspiracy to import cocaine. Defendants argue that the district court: (1) erred in denying their motions for judgment of acquittal; (2) erred in determining cocaine quantity at sentencing; (3) abused its discretion in fashioning their sentences; (4) violated their Sixth Amendment right to a public trial; and (5) erred in applying a two-level sentencing enhancement for the foreseeable presence of a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. SepulvedaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Yeje-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Burgos-MontesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Rosario-CamachoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. ParigianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- United States v. FordCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.