Legal Opinion

Vela v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 7, 1981No. 77-1860PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We reverse appellant’s second-degree murder conviction on the ground that both the pattern and content of the prosecutor’s questioning, as well as portions of her closing argument, impermissibly prejudiced appellant’s right to a fair trial. Peterson v. State, 376 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), cert. denied, 386 So.2d 642 (Fla.1980); Sims v. State, 371 So.2d 211 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Porter v. State, 347 So.2d 449 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), after remand, 386 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Our ruling makes it unnecessary to consider the other grounds for reversal raised by appellant.

Reversed and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  2. Porter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Porter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  4. Sims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  2. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API