Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nelson v. Oregon Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 13, 1990No. A8712-07513; CA A51250Published

1DissentRiggs, J.

Because the majority misconstrues the nature of this case and then misapplies the law, I dissent.

The only issue that the trial court decided was that a difference existed between a deletion of a car from a policy and a termination of coverage. The trial court concluded that that difference precluded the application of the cancellation statute to this case. Whether there is a legal difference for purposes of former ORS 743.900(4) between a deletion of a car from a policy and a termination of coverage is not discernible from the statute. When statutory language lends itself to more than one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Portland v. RiceOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of Portland v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. North Pacific Insurance v. Forest Industries Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. NORTH PAC. INS. v. Forest Indus. Ins. Exch.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API