Legal Opinion

Ober v. Joia

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 1, 1955No. 7735Published

1Opinion of the CourtNash, J.

Contract to recover a commission allegedly due from the defendants. The answer was a general denial and payment. The case was tried with the cases of Arthur R. and Susan Joia v. Anna Ober, Admx. and Oscar A. and Cressida V. Mahon against Arthur R. and Susan Joia.

Upon sufficient evidence the trial court (Callan, J.) found that the defendants, Joia, owned real estate at Onset consisting of a two-family house and that *29on September 10, 1952 they entered into an agreement for the sale of this house for $8,500.00 through the plaintiff’s intestate, acting for them as broker, to one Mahon and his…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fitzpatrick v. GilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  2. Elliott v. KazajianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Roche v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Rice v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  5. Ward v. CobbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API