Legal Opinion

Best v. Starks

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for a new trial upon a case and affidavits, upon the ground of erroneous rulings of the court. Also, that the verdict is against the weight of evidence. Also, on the ground of newly discovered evidence.

1Opinion of the Court

Hogeboom, Justice.

This suit was originally brought by Jacob L. Best to recover against the defendants (who were a firm under the name of Starks & Weatherby) moneys paid by him, for their benefit, upon a note signed by him as their surety to Aaron Huyck. Best having pendente lite assigned the claim to plaintiff, the latter was substituted as the party plaintiff.

Starks defends the suit upon the ground that the money borrowed of Huyck was not borrowed for the firm but for Weatherby, who was a brother-in-law of Best; that it was never appropriated to the use of the firm; that by reason of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baltimore and Susquehanna Railroad Co. v. NesbitSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  2. Whitaker v. BrownCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  3. Church v. SparrowNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  4. Onondaga County Bank v. De PuyNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  5. United States v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1850

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Terwilliger v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Schlesinger v. MalloyNew York Marine Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API