Legal Opinion

Tarbell v. Howard

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.

These actions arise out of an automobile accident in which cars driven by the respective parties came into collision. The accident occurred about October 17, 1936.

In action No. 1 the summons without a complaint was served February 12, 1937. Howard’s attorneys appeared March 5, 1937. The complaint was served by mail March twelfth. Howard’s answer was served April second, though not due.

In action No. 2 a summons and complaint were served March 3, 1937, by mail. The answer was, therefore, due March twenty-sixth, *607which would have been the date of issue in action No. 2 if an answer had been served.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cornell v. BonsallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. Hull v. ShannonNew York Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Robinson v. WhitakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  4. Dexter Sulphite Pulp & Paper Co. v. HearstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kent Development Co. v. LiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. I. Berlin & Son, Inc. v. New York City Omnibus Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API