Legal Opinion · Dissent

Insurance Co. of North America v. Travelers Insurance Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1997No. Nos. 70147 and 71044Published

1DissentPatton, Judge

Although I agree with that part of the majority’s opinion in which it finds that INA’s coverage did not extend to the Brewer claim, I must dissent from its conclusion that the trial court erred by finding that Travelers should bear the cost of the Brewer settlement. Respectfully, I believe that the majority’s emphasis on INA’s failure to reserve its rights comes at the expense of addressing the lack of any actual prejudice suffered by Travelers.

The majority candidly concedes that “INA’s coverage did not extend to the Brewer claim.” Despite making this point, the majority finds that INA was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Turner Liquidating Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1944
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. KammeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API