Legal Opinion

People v. El Amin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 16, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that the People failed to present legally sufficient evidence that he possessed forged instruments with knowledge that they were forged. Knowledge of forgery may be established by circumstantial evidence of a defendant’s conduct and the surrounding events (People v Johnson, 65 NY2d 556, 561; see also, People v Von Werne, 41 NY2d 584, 590). Evidence that defendant had unrestricted access to the bank withdrawal *992forms, lost passbook affidavits and power of attorney forms; that the person whose signature…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MathisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API