Legal Opinion

Scamman v. Sondheim

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 5, 1952No. 4077PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

In the absence of special circumstances, it is the general rule that an executor or administrator is the only proper party to bring or defend actions relating to the personal estate of the deceased. Reynolds v. Kenney, 87 N. H. 313, 314; Mitchell v. Smith, 90 N. H. 36, 41; Champollion v. Corbin, 71 N. H. 78. “In contrast, heirs and legatees are not parties in interest, in the legal sense of the term, in a proceeding by or against the representative of the estate, any more than creditors. The representative’s authority is regulated by statute, and in general he is under judicial control…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brzica v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Snyder v. New Hampshire Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Town of Rye v. CiborowskiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. King v. NedovichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Porter v. Dartmouth CollegeDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API