Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Baughman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Wayne Circuit in Chancery.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chief Justice:

The notice is sufficient. Rule 1 governs this case.*

Rulo 7 is as follows: “The day on which any rule shall be entered, or order, notice, pleading, or paper served, shall be excluded in the computation of the time for complying with the exigency of such rule, order or notice, pleading or paper, and *299the day on wliicb a compliance therewith is required, shall be included, except where it shall fall on a Sunday, in which case the party shall have the next day to comply therewith. When by the terms of any order an act is directed to be performed instanter, it shall be done in…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. MuchenbergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Lickly v. BishoppMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Fowler v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Jeffrey Haksluoto v. Mt Clemens Regional Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API