Legal Opinion

Van Housen v. Thorne

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 17, 1900Published

Bill for Relief.—Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Farlin Q. Ball, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shepard

Appellant filed his cross-bill in a certain cause in- chancery, wherein one Quimby is complainant, and he is one of numerous defendants. On motion in said cause it was ordered that his cross-bill be stricken from the files, and this appeal is from such order.

The original cause begun by Quimby is still pending and undetermined in the Superior Court, and the point is made and pressed by appellees, that the order striking the cross-bill from the files was purely interlocutory, and not subject to be appealed from.

No reply to the point is made' by appellant. We have examined into the record…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. French v. Bellows Falls Savings InstitutionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  2. Lawrence v. PadenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API