Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Breeze v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 1994No. 93-791Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBooth, Judge

We are required to reverse the sentence in this case because of this court’s opinion in Baxter v. State, 617 So.2d 338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). However, Baxter does not require that on remand for resentencing the trial court not consider the prior conviction which has since been affirmed on appeal. That position was not urged by the State in Baxter 1 and not considered by this court in that case.

I would, therefore, concur in the majority’s affirmance of the conviction for second-degree murder and in the remand for resen-tencing under Baxter, but would dissent from the limitation imposed on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baxter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API