Legal Opinion
In re Marsh
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided June 18, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion
In Bankruptcy. On application for discharge.
1Opinion of the Court
WHEELER, District Judge.
This is an application for a discharge heard on report of the referee. The objections filed are: “First. Because the bankrupt did not make a full and true disclosure of his property. Second. Because he concealed property belonging to the estate. Third. Because he has assisted in converting and destroying property belonging to the estate.” Omissions or even concealments of assets are not made valid objections to a discharge, hut only omission of offenses punishable by imprisonment, and failure to keep hooks, with fraudulent intent. Bankr. Act, § 14b. A bankrupt is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1898
- Hackett v. MoxleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1895
- In re Nelson's willSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
- In re RooneyDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1901
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re CristDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1902