Legal Opinion
In Re Weismann
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 29, 1932No. 50604PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.
The report of the special master recommending that a discharge be granted to the bankrupt will be confirmed.
1. The first specification in opposition to discharge is that the bankrupt failed to keep books. Under section 14b of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended by Act May 27, 1926, § 6, 11 USCA § 32 (b), the second ground for denying discharge is that the bankrupt “failed to keep books of account, or records, from which his financial condition and business transactions might be ascertained; unless the court deem such failure 3 * * to have been justified, under all the…
2Cited by17 opinions
- Malloy v. Goldstein (In Re Goldstein)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Milam v. Wilson (In Re Wilson)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1983
- Bernstein v. Carl Zeiss, Inc. (In Re Bernstein)District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
- Morris Plan Industrial Bank of New York v. DreherCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- In the Matter of Arthur J. Halpern, Bankrupt-Appellee. Chase Manhattan Bank, Objectant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.