Rose v. Woodruff
New York Court of Chancery
THE BILL, in this cause, was taken pro confesso, and -an order for that purpose was obtained and entered on the 17th of July last.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The course and practice of the Court* is not to pronounce a decree in any case, (except where a cause had been submitted to the Court, out of term, by consent of parties,) unless the cause had been regularly s,et down for hearing in term. The rule is the same, whether the decree is to be pronounced upon the bill only, or upon the bill and answer, or upon the pleadings and proofs. When the cause has been regularly brought to a hearing, and time taken to consider, the decree may be entered at any time thereafter, in term time, or in vacation, in the Chan.cellor’s discretion,…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- H. Wagner & Adler Co. v. MaliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Russell v. LathropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Southern Pac. R. v. TempleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1893
- Du Pont v. BauduyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1821
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.