Legal Opinion

Larew v. Larew

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 18, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Prentis, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court..The question to be here determined is the true construction of the third clause of the will of Samuel L. Larew, Sr., hereinafter called the testator. It reads:

“3rd. I hereby will and bequeath (after the payment of all just debts and funeral expenses which my said executor shall discharge) all my real estate (except those items directed in the first clause of my will to be sold), including the investments in real estate that shall be made by my executor under the first clause of my will, and all my household goods and all my stock and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beilstein v. BeilsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Butler v. HuestisIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Richardson v. NoyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1806
  4. Hertz v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Outland v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Young v. Munsey Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Claiborne v. WilsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  3. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
  4. Farrar v. PembertonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API