Legal Opinion

Kingman v. Sparrow

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1851PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Ejectment for dower. The action was commenced in 1844, tried December, 1848, and a verdict for the plaintiff subject to the opinion of the court at general term, The facts are suffu ciently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Martin, J.

At any time during the marriage, was George G. Kingman, late husband of the plaintiff, seised of an estate of inheritance of an undivided half, or any portion, of the lands described in the declaration ? Unless he was, the plaintiff can not recover

The premises, in which dower is claimed, consist of a portion of Black Rock dam, upon which mills are erected. Dower is claimed in the mills, and also in the storehouse erected upon piles in Black Rock harbor. The dam was erected by the state in 1824-5, in the bed of that part of Niagara river passing between Squaw Island and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Canal Commissioners v. PeopleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Niagara Falls Power Co. v. Water Power & Control CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Champlain & St. Lawrence Rail Road v. ValentineNew York Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Coburn v. AmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Wetmore v. LawNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Morgan v. KingNew York Supreme Court · 1858

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API