Legal Opinion
Boyce v. Gumley-Haft, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 10, 2011PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*492The motion court correctly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment with respect to the claims under both the New York City Human Rights Law and the Executive Law. The record shows that defendant was the 50% owner of the limited liability company (LLC) that owned the subject building. The contract between the management company (Gumley-Haft) and the LLC provided that all employees hired by Gumley-Haft were in fact émployees of the LLC owner. Defendant, as 50% owner of the limited liability company, and with the power to hire and fire employees, was “amenable to liability [under the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Loschiavo v. Port Auth. of New York & New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Aquino v. Kuczinski, Vila Associates, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Pepler v. CoyneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- Singh v. Covenant Aviation Sec., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Doe v. Bloomberg, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Gordon v. Bayrock Sapir Org. LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Margaret Doe v. Bloomberg, L.PNew York Court of Appeals · 2021
- Singh v. Covenant Aviation Security, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015