Legal Opinion

Hester v. PUREX CORPORATION LTD.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 1, 1975No. 46774PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLIN, Justice.

This is an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from a breach of implied warranty, involving a cleaning product manufactured by defendant Purex Corporation, and sold to plaintiff’s employer. Although the demurrer was directed to the statute of limitations 12A O.S.1971, § 2-725 and 12 O.S.1971, § 95(3) we deal first with whether or not the plaintiff as an employee is authorized to bring- an action for personal injury-based upon the warranty provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code.

We hold that he is not.

Plaintiff was employed by American Airlines,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  2. Moss v. Polyco, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Hardesty v. Andro Corporation-Webster DivisionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Old Albany Estates, Ltd. v. Highland Carpet Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  4. Taylor v. Ford Motor CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Bellman v. NXP Semiconductors USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API