Legal Opinion

La Canin v. Automobile Ins.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 18, 1941No. Civil No. 2170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion requiring the defendant, The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, to furnish the plaintiff with a bill of particulars of its defense setting forth the following items:

“1. State whether or not defendant will claim upon the trial of this action that the policy sued upon is void because of fraud or misrepresentation by the insured, as set forth in lines T’ to ‘6’ of said policy, and if so, specify the particular provision or provisions of said policy upon which defendant will rely.

“2. State whether or not defendant will claim upon the trial of this…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Barry v. Reading Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1943
  2. Bank of Utica v. Canners Exchange Subscribers at Warner Inter-Insurance BureauNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API