Legal Opinion
Shore v. Cross
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 16, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a permittee under a package store permit, issued pursuant to the provisions of the Liquor Control Act of the state of Connecticut (section 688b, Cumulative Supplement 1931-1933 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, p. 295), seeks an injunction restraining the enforcement of the provisions of that act contending that its provisions relating to druggist permits are discriminatory and that by reason of such discrimination, he is being damaged and deprived of equal protection of the law, and that enforcement will deprive him of his property, without due…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thurlow v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. SilvermanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1955