Legal Opinion

A.V. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 29, 2012No. 3D11-270Published

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Prestley v. State, 896 So.2d 862, 864 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“Occupants of a car differ from, for example, customers in a store or passengers on a public bus. Occupants of a private vehicle are traveling together by choice and thus may be assumed to have some personal or business association with one another. Knowledge or suspicion that one of the occupants has been involved in criminal activity occurring within the car, or involving the car itself, serves as a basis for a reasonable suspicion that the other occupants may be participants in that activity. Therefore, we conclude…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. in the Interest of H.J.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. V.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. O.B. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Prestley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API