Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 14, 1954No. Reap. Dec. 8307; Entry No. 752294, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these appeals for reappraisement consists of certain cigars exported from Cuba during the months of April, May, and June 1946. The cigars were invoiced and entered at various unit prices, plus packing, and were appraised at the same unit prices, net, plus 2.2 per centum Cuban sales tax, plus case packing, on the basis of foreign value.

There is no dispute between the parties as to the per se values of the cigars or the cost of packing. The sole claim of the plaintiffs is that the Cuban sales tax of 2.2 per centum forms no part of the dutiable value…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. PassavantSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. Tadross & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Shaw v. Goebel Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  2. Dunlap v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API