Rattray v. Banks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. A beneficiary in a life-insurance policy, where the insured has reserved the right to change the beneficiary, has no vested interest, and an assignment of the policy by the insured to a creditor, for the purpose of securing an indebtedness of the insured which is less than the face value of the policy, amounts to a change of beneficiary pro tanto.
2. A consent by the beneficiary to the assignment is, since the beneficiary’s interest has thus been divested by the insured, unnecessary to the validity of the assignment, and where such beneficiary' is the wife of the insured, a consent by her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cohen v. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Cohn v. MaloneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Smith v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Grenville v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Antley v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
- Merchants Bank v. GarrardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Baldwin v. WheatSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- Hack v. MetzSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
- Baldwin v. Atlanta Joint Stock Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.