Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2012No. 19-2245PublishedCited by 118 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed suit in its own name against CRST Van Expedited, Inc. (CRST), alleging that CRST subjected Mo-nika Starke “and approximately 270 similarly situated female employees” to a hostile work environment, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Starke and Remcey Jeunenne Peeples intervened in the EEOC-instituted action and individually pursued their respective hostile work-environment claims against CRST, as well as claims for unlawful retaliation under Title VII…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by118 opinions

  1. Vance v. Ball State Univ.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Michael Sellers v. Deere & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  4. Arizona Ex Rel Thomas Horne v. the Geo GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Dante Combs v. The Cordish Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017

113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API