Legal Opinion

William Leighton v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 10, 1955No. 12404PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

William Leighton, the petitioner, sought to persuade the Securities and Exchange Commission to assume jurisdiction to investigate and regulate the issuance and sale by the American Express Company of travelers checks, contending they are securities within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933. 1 The Commission refused. Leighton then petitioned this court to review the Commission’s refusal, contending jurisdiction resides in this court under Section 9(a) of the Securities Act 2 and Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act. 3 The Commission has moved that we dismiss the petition for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crooker v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Medical Committee for Human Rights v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Joseph Curran, Individually and on Behalf of All the Members of the National Maritime Union of America, Afl-Cio v. Melvin R. LairdCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Bruce C. Kixmiller v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  4. Guy Gentile v. SECCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API