Legal Opinion

Englehart v. Cassatt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1931No. Appeal, 99PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

The relevant facts in this case are as follows: On October 22, 1929, plaintiff, through his local bank, authorized defendants to purchase for him 200 shares of the stock of the Vanadium Corporation of America, at $77 per share. On the same day, they purchased it at that price, and so notified his bank, which thereupon advised them that if they would deliver the certificates to a specified New York bank, they would be paid the purchase price and the commission due to them for their services. On October 25, 1929, an employee of defendants mistakenly delivered to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gorman v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Billmeyer, Dill & Co. v. WagnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Barbour v. SproulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  4. Berkheimer v. GeiseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
  5. Beloit Iron Works v. LockhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gold & Co. v. Northeast Theater Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Shearson Loeb Rhoades, Inc. v. MedlinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Murphy v. SincereAppellate Court of Illinois · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API