GWENDOLYN LITTMAN v. ANDREW CACHO.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Senior Judge:
On July 12, 2013, Judge Di Toro issued the “Second Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of Permanent Custody” (the “July 2013 Custody Order”); which provided, inter alia, that appellant Gwendolyn Littman would have “reasonable rights of visitation [with her grandson A.L.], to be arranged by the parties, and to include overnight visitation by agreement of the parties.” Subsequently, Judge Iscoe terminated Littman’s visitation rights with A.L. in an Order Modifying “Second Amended Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order of Permanent Custody” (the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- In re J.D.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Jordan v. JordanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Moran v. MoranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. Precision Systems, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021