Legal Opinion

Grand Jury Proceedings

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 8, 2022No. 2021-0048Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS Grand Jury Action No. 21-48 (BAH) Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell MEMORANDUM OPINION This is the fifth occasion—and hopefully the last—that petitioner Giorgi Rtskhiladze has called upon the Court to extend the ordinary parameters of how a grand jury transcript is to be handled to maintain the secrecy required under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e). See, e.g., In re Grand Jury Procs. (“Notetaking Order”), No. 21-gj-48 (BAH),

2021 WL 7908202

(D.D.C. Dec. 29, 2021); In re Grand Jury Procs. (“Denial Order”),…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  3. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  5. Banister v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API