Trent v. Barrows
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtMcAMIS, P. J.
Mrs. Gladys Trent brought this action against R. E. Barrows and his daughter, Ann Barrows, for damages allegedly growing out of the operation of the father’s automobile by the daughter, under circumstances making applicable the “Family Purpose Doctrine ’ ’.
There was a directed verdict for defendants at the conclusion of plaintiff’s proof in chief, on the ground that the action was one to recover for fright without any physical injury resulting therefrom and, therefore, an injury for which the law affords no redress. Plaintiff has appealed and assigned errors.
The declaration charges that on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- International Harvester Co. v. SartainCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Gulf Refining Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1932
- Memphis St. Ry. Co. v. BernsteinTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- Nuckles v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1927
- Colsher v. Tennessee Electric Power Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Hughes v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- Camper v. MinorTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Gilliam v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Shelton v. Russell Pipe & Foundry Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.