Colonnade 101 Se v. Cambero Cordero
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.
We affirm the nonfinal order below, which granted appellant^ the precise relief they sought in the trial court. Appellants’ motion sought an order dissolving several notices of lis pendens, contending that the notices were - both procedurally and substantively improper. The trial court held a non-evidentiary hearing oh the motion, a procedure which appellants did not object to. ' Following arguments of counsel, the court granted1 the motion and eñtered an order dissolving-the notices of lis pendens upon a determination that they were procedurally defective. The court further stated in its…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Credit Industrial Co. v. Re-Mark Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Katz v. Red Top Sedan Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- Morgan v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of New York Mellon v. PearsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION v. ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC., A/A/O MARIE GUERRIERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023