Legal Opinion

Colonnade 101 Se v. Cambero Cordero

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 11, 2016No. 15-0721PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.

We affirm the nonfinal order below, which granted appellant^ the precise relief they sought in the trial court. Appellants’ motion sought an order dissolving several notices of lis pendens, contending that the notices were - both procedurally and substantively improper. The trial court held a non-evidentiary hearing oh the motion, a procedure which appellants did not object to. ' Following arguments of counsel, the court granted1 the motion and eñtered an order dissolving-the notices of lis pendens upon a determination that they were procedurally defective. The court further stated in its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Credit Industrial Co. v. Re-Mark Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Katz v. Red Top Sedan Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Morgan v. MorganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of New York Mellon v. PearsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION v. ALL INSURANCE RESTORATION SERVICES, INC., A/A/O MARIE GUERRIERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API