Legal Opinion

Garcia ex rel. Nominal Royal Administrative Services, Inc. v. Deyesso

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided December 4, 2012No. SUCV201203509BLS1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, Thomas P., J.

For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Unauthorized Derivative Claim and C. 93A Claim Is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as specified in the Order below.

ALLEGATIONS OF THE COMPLAINT

According to the Complaint, Royal Administrative Services, Inc. (“RAS, Inc.”) is a Florida corporation, while Royal Administrative Services, LLC (“RAS, LLC”) is a Massachusetts limited liability corporation. The plaintiffs are minority shareholders and members, respectively, in each entity, while defendants Deyesso and McCabe together hold a majority interest (38.25%…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Schaer v. Brandeis UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Manning v. ZuckermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JON J. RAPPAPORT v. ARTHUR F. SCHERR, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API