Clear Channel Outdoor v. Dir., Dept. of Finance Balt. City
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Director, Department of Finance of Baltimore City, No. 2910, Sept. Term 2018. Opinion filed on January 29, 2020, by Berger, J. EXCISE TAX – FIRST AMENDMENT An excise tax, imposed on the privilege to charge others a fee to use billboard space, does not implicate the First Amendment. EXCISE TAX – FIRST AMENDMENT – COMMUNICATIVE ELEMENTS – EXPRESSIVE ELEMENTS Taxation of a billboard company’s economic privilege does not possess sufficient communicative or expressive elements for the First Amendment to come into play. FIRST AMENDMENT – BILLBOARD DISPLAYS – FEES…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Virginia v. BlackSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lamar Advantage GP Co., L.L.C. v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Clear Channel Outdoor v. Dept. of FinanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- 901, LLC v. Sup'v. of AssessmentsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024