Legal Opinion
Fematt v. City of Los Angeles, Cal.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 30, 1961No. Civ. 262-61PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KUNZEL, District Judge.
This matter comes up on respondents’ exceptions to the libel, the exceptions being that the libel shows on its face (1) that it is barred by laches, (2) that it is barred by the California statute of limitations of one year, and (3) that libelant has failed to comply with the California claim statutes.
The facts in this case are set forth in Fematt v. Nedlloyd Line, D.C.S.D.Cal. 1961, 191 F.Supp. 907, a case pending on the law side of this court, No. 321-59-K, in which respondents herein are third-party defendants. After the court denied plaintiff leave to amend his…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- O'Donnell v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Detroit Trust Co. v. the Thomas BarlumSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY AND THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME v. SS BournemouthDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
- Gebhard v. S.S. Hawaiian LegislatorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Adams v. Harris County, TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.