Weightman v. Caldwell
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
17 U.S. 53 (____)
4 Wheat. 53
WEIGHTMAN
v.
CALDWELL.
Supreme Court of United States.
This cause was argued by Jones and Key, for the plaintiff in error,[(b)] and by Caldwell and Swann, for the defendant in error.[(c)]
*JOHNSON, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court. [*86
The suit below was instituted on a promissory note by the defendant in error. Although it is, in fact, an indorsed note, and so declared on, yet it is admitted to have originated in a negotiation between the maker and indorser, and whatever defence would be good as against the promisee, is admitted to be maintainable against this…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leonard v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Parkhurst v. Van CortlandtNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Hunt v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Clason v. BaileyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1817
- Bailey v. OgdenNew York Supreme Court · 1808
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bratton v. BroomfieldDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Cabardo v. PatacsilUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Cooper v. Allison et a.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
- D'Amico Dry Limited v. Primera MaritimeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- D=Amico Dry Limited v. Primera MaritimeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.