Legal Opinion

Weightman v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 10, 1819PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

17 U.S. 53 (____)

4 Wheat. 53

WEIGHTMAN

v.

CALDWELL.

Supreme Court of United States.

This cause was argued by Jones and Key, for the plaintiff in error,[(b)] and by Caldwell and Swann, for the defendant in error.[(c)]

*JOHNSON, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court. [*86

The suit below was instituted on a promissory note by the defendant in error. Although it is, in fact, an indorsed note, and so declared on, yet it is admitted to have originated in a negotiation between the maker and indorser, and whatever defence would be good as against the promisee, is admitted to be maintainable against this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leonard v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. Parkhurst v. Van CortlandtNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  3. Hunt v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
  4. Clason v. BaileyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1817
  5. Bailey v. OgdenNew York Supreme Court · 1808

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bratton v. BroomfieldDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Cabardo v. PatacsilUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. Cooper v. Allison et a.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. D'Amico Dry Limited v. Primera MaritimeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  5. D=Amico Dry Limited v. Primera MaritimeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API