Cavin v. Powell

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Rachel Cavin appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion for new trial or to set aside the default judgment entered in favor of Dana Powell. Cavin contends that the trial court erred in denying her motion because the damages awarded to Powell were excessive as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

The record shows that in November 2003, Cavin and Powell were involved in an automobile accident in which Powell suffered serious injuries. On January 4,2005, Powell filed suit against Cavin, alleging negligence and seeking $100,000 in…