Legal Opinion

State v. Pelayo

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided May 5, 1994PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WHITE, Judge.

Appellant raises one issue in this appeal as of right pursuant to Rule 3(b) of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. He contends that the trial court erred in allowing separate convictions for two counts of aggravated assault against the same victim and occurring at the same time and place. For reasons set forth in this opinion, we reverse and set aside one of the convictions.

Appellant, Francisco Medan Pelayo, was indicted in a two-count indictment. Count one of the indictment alleged that appellant “on the 10th day of December, 1991, in Davidson County, Tennessee…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. IrvinTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. GoinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. DentonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State of Iowa v. Valentin VelezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  4. State v. Villanueva-GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API