Carroll v. Hicks
Cherokee Indian Tribal Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
J. MATTHEW MARTIN, Associate Judge.
In this pro se civil action, the Plaintiffs raise a number of issues and claims for relief.
[T]he Court is mindful that the [Plaintiffs are] proceeding pro se, and thus the Court recognizes that ‘[i]n the great run of pro se cases, the issues are faintly articulated and often only dimly perceived. There is, therefore, a greater burden and a correlative greater responsibility upon the ... court to insure that constitutional deprivations are redressed and that justice is done.’ Gordon v. Leeke, 5714 F.2d 1147 (4th Cir.1978); accord, Beaudett v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Phyllis Lynch v. Frank W. SneppCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Lynch v. SneppDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1972