Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Hicks

Cherokee Indian Tribal Court

Decided April 11, 2012No. CV-12-184Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

J. MATTHEW MARTIN, Associate Judge.

In this pro se civil action, the Plaintiffs raise a number of issues and claims for relief.

[T]he Court is mindful that the [Plaintiffs are] proceeding pro se, and thus the Court recognizes that ‘[i]n the great run of pro se cases, the issues are faintly articulated and often only dimly perceived. There is, therefore, a greater burden and a correlative greater responsibility upon the ... court to insure that constitutional deprivations are redressed and that justice is done.’ Gordon v. Leeke, 5714 F.2d 1147 (4th Cir.1978); accord, Beaudett v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruce Beaudett v. City of Hampton City Attorneys A. Paul Burton and W. Stephen Moore Judge T.H. Wilson, II and Judge Nelson T. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Phyllis Lynch v. Frank W. SneppCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  4. Lynch v. SneppDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API