Legal Opinion

William I. Tenzer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 30, 1960No. 16513_1PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Tenzer contends that he has a right to-litigate in the Tax Court a deficiency determination on his 1952 federal income-taxes because he filed there a petition for review within 90 days1 after personal service 2 upon him of a copy of the Commissioner’s notice which was adverse to-him. This notice is commonly called the 90-day letter. But the Commissioner-says, “No.” He relies on the fact that-the collector, 28 days before the personal service, had placed in the mail3 the same-notice addressed to Tenzer at his correct address in Los Angeles.4 The Commissioner counts the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clifford O. Boren v. R. A. Riddell, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. Bernard Bloch v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Dolezilek v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  4. Eppler v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Rosewood Hotel, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Meyer Harris Cohen, AKA Michael 'Mickey' Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Frieling v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  3. Pyo v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  4. Lifter v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  5. Floyd R. Clodfelter and Enna L. Clodfelter v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API