Partch v. Baird

The statement in the original opinion in this case (227 Mich. 660) that “In the first judgment entered no finding of unfitness of the father is found,” is erroneous. The error, in substance, appears again in the opinion of Justice Bird on rehearing.

The first judgment was entered on September 28, 1923. In the return to the writ of certiorari, Judge Sample stated:

“I further return that on September 28, 1923, a judgment was signed by me and entered in said cause, a true copy of which is incorporated in appellant’s petition for a writ of certiorari and marked Exhibit D.”

Exhibit D appears in the…