Legal Opinion

Cleveland Faucet Co. v. Vulcan Brass Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided March 5, 1896No. 5,439PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SEVERENS, District Judge.

The complainants filed their bill in this case for the purpose of obtaining an injunction against the defendants, restricting them from their alleged infringement of patent No. 353,723, bearing date December 7, 1886, issued to Albert J. and Edward H. Weatherhead, for “improvements in force and drain faucets,” and for further incidental relief.

The defendants demurred to the bill upon the grounds following;

*506“(1) That complainant hath not, in and by said bill, made or stated such a cause as entitles it to the relief prayed for.
“(2) That the patent in suit shows on its…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Corn-Planter PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. American Fibre-Chamois Co. v. Buckskin-Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  3. Busell Trimmer Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. L. Schreiber & Sons Co. v. GrimmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Conley v. MarumU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API