Legal Opinion

Zemcar Inc. D/B/A Grip Mobility Co. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided March 20, 2026No. 2484CV01525-BLS2Published

1Opinion of the Court

Uber Technologies, Inc., retained Zemcar Inc.—which was doing business as Grip Mobility Co. (“Grip”)— to develop a smart-phone-based app that would make audiovisual recordings of Uber rides, to protect both passengers and drivers. Grip contends that its app was a great success during a Brazilian pilot program; Uber asserts that the app had “significant issues and limitations.” Uber and Grip also discussed the possibility of incorporating Grip’s audiovisual-capture solution in software for unaccompanied minors using rideshares. After terminating its relationship with Grip, Uber released an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Inteliclear, LLC v. Etc Global HoldingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. J. T. Healy & Son, Inc. v. James A. Murphy & Son, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
  3. Idx Systems Corporation v. Epic Systems Corporation, University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation, Mitchell Quade, and Michael RosencranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Incase Incorporated v. Timex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  5. Roger Burten D/B/A Rainy Day Games & Toys v. Milton Bradley CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API